Susan Armstrong/Hamstrong connection?

I was looking at the where people can post the pictures under "You Spotted".. Is this pig named after Susan Armstrong by chance? (the woman who wrote the folio article on taylor) The pigs name is Susan Hamstrong aka The Squealer.  j.w. Here is the link to the picture.

http://spotted.myclaysun.com/pages/gallery.php?gallery=307202




Submitted by vicedr on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 6:04pm.

The squealing pig was named Susan Armstrong by Lancaster I believe the article said.  I bet she felt complimented.  To someone who tries to make public all the wrong that is happening around town I'd bet she took pride in that pig being named for her!  I would if I was her!  Just my observation but it appears that the ones that hate her are the ones that want their secrets to stay away from public view.  Those with no secrets seem to like her.  That is just my observation. 




Submitted by ClayCitizen2008 on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 8:40pm.

Lancaster couldnt have named the pig because he would not be eligible because you can only raise a pig up to age 18 in 4-h. im curious as to whose pig it was. Honestly i think it is rather amusing. No offense to you Vicedr, but i find it hard to believe everything Susan claims to be true.  it seems like she has a political agenda to me, but that is just how i see it. I respect anyone's view and try to see every side. I think it is kind of fishy how she has written an article on four seperate figures, three of which were in goverment the other being Mr. Taylor's son. But everyone she has written an article on has been cleared of any wrong doing, besides arthor ivey who has not gone to court yet. Even in the grand jury agaisnt scott, the grand jury stated that she knew what she was writing to be false even before she ran the article.




Submitted by OldTimer on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 8:47pm.

Folks, I've been spending a lot of time with family and haven't even looked online for a while.  But, you know, I've noticed that decent folks tend to state the facts related to their point of view, and minimize abusive references.




Submitted by Jackal on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 9:11pm.

SusieQ named after a pig. I missed that barbeque! She writes National Enquirer style for all of you who believe her. I mean the stories start out with something happened, but end up with a sighting of a UFO somewhere in her articles. Anyone who thinks what she writes is truth would probably tell me Elvis is still alive. Anyway for those who got to eat Susie Hamstrong I hope it gave you pleasure and filled your tummies!




Submitted by ClayCitizen2008 on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 9:11pm.

so oldtimer, now you are taking a shot at me, when all i am doing is simply stating my point of view? from what i can see most people on the blogs are rather biased in the area of politics. i would appreciate it if you do not insult my intelligence and character saying that i am not a decent person. at least that is how i took your comment. hopefully i am reading your blog wrong and your comment was not directed towards me especially when i was replying. I was always taught if you cant say somthing nice then dont say it at all. But i see it perfectly okay and reasonable to state the facts. and just because i stated one question about a pig named susan hamstrong does not mean that i can not talk about different subjects especially when i am replying to a statement that was replyed to my initial comment. if your comment was directed towards me i would like you to state what i said was "abusive." like i say i am just stating my point of view i am not attacking anyone's character which seems to be more or less what you are doing. i just think it is amusing how these articles are timed to come out in election year. Dont get me wrong the folio is a good paper, but it is a news and OPINION magazine not fact.  




Submitted by vicedr on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 10:18pm.

It should have been obvious to you as it was all of us that the article was taken strickly from official reports.  I can assure you her legal advisors mulled over it before it was released.  I am sure there is more to the story, but more that was not disclosed due to threat of suing by the Taylors.  He has no lawsuit there the way it was written.  It was totally legal and totally appauling to most of us!  Taylor supporters are just mad that everyone is finding out their secrets.  We don't need a sheriff with those kind of secrets.  Personally the hazing was enough for me to be convinced Taylor is not a good candidate.  If you can't control your kid you can't control an entire county! Tell me, wasn't there some other shirt thing the kid did at school.  Something to do with the fence.  I never heard the whole story but heard he got suspension for it.  Maybe you can enlighten us.  You know the only people who hate Susan Armstrong are the ones who have stuff to hide.  She is a great instinctive reporter.




Submitted by John1970 on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 10:22pm.

To inform all of you the pig was named by Daniel Lancaster. He was a member of 4-h, i remember seeing the pig at the fair and having a quick laugh. Though I do not know the kid you have to admit he has a pretty good sense of humor. and i have to agree with jackal, i bet Susie Hamstrong did taste good, it was about time someone through her on the grill to be cooked.




Submitted by vicedr on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 10:36pm.

Did you sign on as a member just to post that? More of the same.




Submitted by lilyslore on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 10:39pm.

What a thoroughly despicable thing to say. The level of conversation on these blogs is really dropping. People like you really bring down the decency level. You must be a spawn of the ignorant RT1.

Lily's Lore "I don't ever want to be rescued And I don't ever want to be saved I got a feelin' that I'm gonna be alive forever Dancin' on the edge of a grave..." Jim Steinman




Submitted by ClayCitizen2008 on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 10:42pm.

1. You dont know the whole stroy because Susan only states one side and if u werent so ignorent then you would relize that. 2. Adam Taylor was 17 when the incident happend therefore that makes this a sealed case and there was a leak somewhere. (there is a law suit there to someone who should be held responsible) Maybe you did not know, but Adam Taylor was cleared two years before Mike Taylor announced his candidacy, only when he annouced he was running did Beseler ask FDLE and the SAO to re-open the case, and once again the case was closed and there were no charges brought agaisnt him.  That doesnt sound like political hogwash to you that beseler requested the case to be re-opened after it was cleared by HIS office two years earlier. 3.When it comes to controling his kids.... you can show someone the door, but you cant make them walk through it. There are a lot of teenagers who do stupid things i was one of them.. did u never make a mistake? the boy may have put himself in a bad situation who knows i wasnt there neither were you or susan armstrong or rick beseler but he was CLEARED of any wrong doing.  and the only reason this is a big deal is because his father decided to run for sheriff.. 4. i agree with the fence shirt, he was expressing his right. the school was going to put a fence around the school locking students in. that is rediculous, if a kid decides to skip he is only hurting himself.5. Taylor people have nothing to hide, im sure Mike would be more than happy to talk to anyone about the issues the county is actually facing. he does return phone calls because he returned mine and i had some tough questions myself. Once again we are all expressing opinions and the fact you say that she is a "instinctive reporter" is an opinion.




Submitted by John1970 on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 10:51pm.

as a matter of fact i did. because susan "cooks" enough people her self its about time for her.  and lily'slore you talking to me about bringing the level of the blog's down? have you read the other entries? gimme a break. seriously. i was not going to register because i knew it would be a waste of time and it seems i was right. you reap what you sow and susan butchers everyone and there brother and i made a simple comment. you people need to get a life.




Submitted by oneguysview on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 11:08pm.

What a terrible bit of writing that is. How did you get out of grade school? Escape? You give rednecks a real bad name.




Submitted by vicedr on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 11:17pm.

Reread article.  It says there was reason for arrest, but SA declined to prosecute.  I would imagine the reason the first case was opened was because there were others that came forward.  There are alot of girls here and you can't tell me with this kid's background he was cleared because that is obviously not true.  If there was reason for arrest, he was guilty.  Successful prosecution is determined on alot of factors. Don't try to feed us that we are ignorant and come in with this stuff about being "cleared."  We know what you are, just one more Taylor supporter that blows off steam everyday.  There's at least 4 that create a new name everyday. 




Submitted by ClayCitizen2008 on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 12:06am.

You have no idea what you are rambling on about. obviously he was NOT prosecuted, therefore the evidence in the case wasnt good enough to prosecute. So you can make accusations all day. Sounds familiar... not the first time a case has been dropped because of lack of evidence.( i am not saying Adam is guilty by any means. ) but didnt micheal wear get off because the Sheriff's Office didnt handle the case correctly and falsified reports? Why dont we ever hear about beseler's son being arrested for shooting a shotgun through the front door? his case isnt dropped and is still pending within the S.A.O. because someone is willing to stand up against you, you accuse them of blowing off steam and creating a new name everyday. the fact is that there is more than a few supporters out there for taylor and beseler knows that. that is why he is using his smear campaign. The FACT is beseler called the same unions asking for their support, and they turned him down. feel free to call the teachers,firemen,and fop and ask. it is no secret. if he really doesnt like the unions he should have never asked for their support in the first place. We will see how much everyone will be talking on august 27. i have a feeling you wont have much to say then, except complaing how taylor probobly rigged the vote. with all do respect or with out respect honestly i dont really care how you take it, but all you do is sit at the computer and talk about other people's kids, how would u feel if everyone accused you son of raping a girl? especially when you know its not true? there is a reason i am supporting taylor and that is because he is a qualified candidate and if u take 30 seconds to read his experience you would see that.




Submitted by ClayCitizen2008 on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 12:09am.

Sorry about any typos, i type kinda fast.




Submitted by John1970 on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 12:16am.

vice dr.... just wondering which article were you refereing to in your first post when you mentioned that lancaster named it. Im guessing your referring to a past folio article?




Submitted by Angela on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 9:00am.

Some people can scare you with statements they make sometimes.

In vicedr post above in reference to the article written they stated:  "He has no lawsuit there the way it was written." I think I would have a different take on that statement.

In that article it alleges the Taylor family has been given preferential treatment because of political and/or personal connections. I certainly hope they can prove that statement. Because I think that a serious charge being made against people in a position of trust. Not only against Mr. Taylor but any person involved in these cases.

Then vicedr goes on to say in another post in this award winning statement of the year: " If there was reason for arrest, he was guilty." People are arrested daily that are found to be not guilty in a court of law.




Submitted by OldTimer on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 4:47pm.

As the most recent newspaper article points out, the real issue lies in the character of the people involved.  Anyone who takes large quantities of newspapers from a public display should be charged with theft, because that's what it is.  Then they would be labeled for what they are. 

Do we really want that clan sitting at the right hand of their sheriff named Mikey?




Submitted by Angela on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 4:51pm.

Was this a staged event. Because every where I went they had papers. Maybe it was a random act of kindness. Move them from one stand to the others.Smile I have not heard one person complain that they were unable to find a paper.




Submitted by Jackal on Sun, 08/10/2008 - 1:27pm.

The name still fits Good Luck!




Submitted by TruthHurts on Sun, 08/10/2008 - 1:36pm.

You are very rude sir.

Not everyone is interested in this topic. 

This is not the only conversation going on here. Some folks are following other topics.

I asked you very nicely to post all your remarks on one post so you would not knock out all the recent comments that some folks may be looking for. then what do you do?? You just continue. Not very nice!! 

TRUTHHURTS

Please go to http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer

and sign the petition for the Fair Tax Bill. Tell Congress to pass this Bill.




Submitted by Republicantruth1 on Sun, 08/10/2008 - 4:58pm.

Welcome to America.  Land of Free Thinking and Free Speech!   Unfortunately the long time members of this blog have been taught to think alike.  They are a cult so be careful not to take any Kool-aid if they offer you any.  Lillyslore is an old lady who will critique your grammar and spelling to try to distract you and get you off message, and Oneguysview has a sexual identity problem because no matter how many times I tell him I am a male he insists on calling me a female.  Not so sure why it matters so much to him so I've concluded it must be a personal issue. Marsha, Marsha, Marsha, well that is all I am going to say about her, and as for Princess Leia, let’s just say she has not visited with Yoda in a while.  

So to say this is a bag of “Mixed-Nuts” would be a major understatement.

Truth Hurts! Republican Truth is Hard but it’s True!




Submitted by PrincessLeia on Sun, 08/10/2008 - 5:28pm.

You are SO funny! Not really, entertaining maybe.

WHAT AMAZES ME THE MOST is that none of you realize the damage you are actually doing to your candidate when you come on here hurling insults. But, that is what desperate people do. I kinda feel sorry for you.. :(

 




Submitted by lilyslore on Sun, 08/10/2008 - 6:33pm.

...with staying on "message" could you please (assuming the capability is there) explain what that particular hissy fit was about? I have never been concerned so much with proper grammar as the uneducated and illogical thnking behind it. After all, if you can not express yourself properly, why would anyone conclude you have the abiltiy reason an idea from point A to Point B?

This latest BS by the Crazy Lady is tantamount to self indictment. I had really hoped you had crawled back to your original identity. What a goober. Lady, get thee to your gynecologist. He has the proper medication for your "condition". Feel no shame. It happens to all women of a "certain age".

I also suspect OneGuy is far more intuitive than you give him credit for. So please stop Blowing Smoke and find a nice hobby. Crewel can be rewarding.

Lily's Lore "I don't ever want to be rescued And I don't ever want to be saved I got a feelin' that I'm gonna be alive forever Dancin' on the edge of a grave..." Jim Steinman




Submitted by oneguysview on Sun, 08/10/2008 - 6:53pm.

Dang! I go away fer a couple of days and come back to another load of overfilled dipers?

Hey, you crazy old bat, who you callin a liar? I got no sexual problems. I can produce a wife to prove it. But I do know when someone is BSin me. You do NOT write like a man. Even Marsha picked up on your style. And I'll also bet Leia and Truth Hurts will agree. Taht's called bein outvoted. I don't care if you think you are male, female or something in between. Judgin by your writing skills I would go with the third choice.  I mean, I ain't all that good at writin either but i think I'm a whole lot more understandable.

If there are any other repubs outthere, you should cionsider revoking this persons membership. She ain't doin you any favors with her ugly rants.




Submitted by TruthHurts on Sun, 08/10/2008 - 7:52pm.

I am an American Republican Consevative. I love my county, and our way of life.

These people do not speak for me or my values.

I think for myself and no other.

I beleive there is some truth being spoken here on both sides of the fence, and somewhere in the middle is the truth.

I feel that neither side on this issue plans on conceding to the other. I recommend speak your mind, get it out of your system, then disengage. 

TRUTHHURTS

Please go to

http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer

and sign the petition for the Fair Tax Bill. Tell Congress to pass this Bill.




Submitted by nobackup on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 4:03am.

Not prosecuted in no way makes someone inocent. Someone decided not to prosecute. Now how do we know why? We don't. You assume not guilty. Another may assume favoritism. Vote for Angela, and not the one who clutters these pages.




Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 250 guests online.

Online users

Recent comments