We touched upon this subject last July.  There were at least a couple of headings.  Do the search in the archives  to refresh your memories.  But I thought it worth while to re examine it because of an interview I came across this weekend.

GAY MARRIAGE!  There.  It's out in the open, so to speak.  Here, in Florida, we'll be facing the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment in Nov.  Speaking of....Just what the heck is it with this state that thinks it has to put issues like this as an amendment?  Same thing with high speed rail.  Are they thinking at all?  But I digress.

Last week, the California Supreme Court ruled that it is a go.  It is going to, no, it has gained national attention.  Right off the top, I can think of three things that will be involved.  Social mores, religion, politics & religion.  I think you see where I'm going.  Already, Matt Staver & his groups are planning a conference, e mailings, polls etc.  Sorry kids, there's no escaping it but the main group against this is the religious right. But back to the interview.

CA Supreme Court Judge, Ronald M. George, a moderate Republican, (I wondered where they were) gave an interview to the LA Times, dated 05.18.08.  In it, he gave his reason for voting with the majority.  He said that it, "weighed most heavily,"  more so than any previous case in his nearly 17 years on the court.  What tipped his decision?  He said that it was the memories of a trip through the American South with his European immigrant parents & seeing signs that said, "NO NEGROES," "NO COLOREDS."  He said that it left an indelible impression on him.  He also said, "I think there are times when doing the right thing means not playing it safe."

I have to admit it.  I agree with him.  But what do you think?  If you entered your thoughts last year, have they changed?  Do you have anything to add.  If you're new, what are your thoughts?  By all means, access the archives for past comments.  Waiting to hear from you.  Have a great one.  JATFUR.

RichK