debate IIthe FOP voted to hold this debate at its regular meeting held the second Tuesday in Dec. The Sheriffs letter indicating he would not attend was recieved last week. The FOP did not schedule the dates to avoid the Sheriff's attendance. On the contrary, the membership wanted him to attend along with the other candidates. The previously mentioned letter announcing the debate also invited each candiate to attend a social event at the lodge on the 8th and 9th of January. The Sheriff declined this invitation as well. The overwhelming support the Union recieved from the deputy's and supervisors may have given the Sheriff a hint that all is not well and he may not have the FOP endorsement in the bag as he had thought. The debate will go on with or without him. Related: adiossheriff's blog | login or register to post comments | printer friendly version | Tags: debate II
Submitted by finder on Wed, 01/02/2008 - 1:24pm.
And when pronounced as long A. Grizelda, you sound just like some of my English teachers from many long years ago. And that is a good thing!! I think we need a lot more of that type of teaching in our schools today. Spell and grammar check are great but only if you know the rules to begin with. Thanks for the trip back in time. Finder People are talking about ...Here are the recent blog postings with the most comments. |
Who's online
There are currently 8 users and 226 guests online.
Recent comments |
EXCEPT after c. (Usually)